Pages

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Sea Dogs, Buccaneers, and Pirates


The idea behind combining D&D with piracy is pretty simple… pure old school D&D rewards bold plans that lead to lots of treasure - the paradigm of the game is XP for gold, by hook or by crook.  Furthermore, by placing adventures within reach of a ship, you introduce the resource planning and mobility from a sister game like Traveller - your dungeon crawlers become sea rovers.  It's a peanut butter and chocolate kind of marriage (if you like the Reese's cups, as I do).

I envision many of the adventures in such a campaign still featuring traditional D&D style delves once a given destination is reached - buried treasures in caves, ruined forts and monasteries abandoned by the Spanish, lost colonies, forbidden islands, ancient ruins of the Maya or Aztecs, and a healthy mix of mythological sites and artifacts. Plus, you know, acting like pirates once in a while and plundering.

The Caribbean changed a lot over the two centuries of Spanish colonization, and the kinds of raiders that pillaged those warm waters included French corsairs, Elizabethan sea dogs, Dutch freebooters, English buccaneers, French filibusters, and eventually pirates (after 1690 or so).

I'd rule out placing the setting in the 16th century, as most of the raiders were privateers working long distance out of European or English ports, and I think the region is much more interesting in the 17th or early 18th centuries when there are foreign colonies and local outposts competing with the Spanish.  Outlaw towns like Tortuga and Port Royal during the buccaneer period offer the kind of "adventuring home base" you need for gathering rumors, picking up crew, and setting out on the next jaunt.  For the pirates of the later period, there are new home bases like New Providence in the Bahamas, or mythical Libertaria in the Indian Ocean.

This is a bit of a history nerd question, but do readers have opinions on which period would work better for adventuring?  1690-1720 is considered the golden age of piracy; since most privateering was outlawed or strictly controlled by then, sea rovers during that time had no choice but to work outside any conventional law.  During the earlier periods, it was much more likely one governor or another could sponsor a ship, giving the raiders a façade of legality in one port or another.

There are other differences too - buccaneers tended to raid Spanish shipping and ports, hauling away the pieces of eight and gold doubloons of pirate lore, and they had their loose code as "Brethren of the Coast".  The Jolly Roger of pirate fame was an artifact of the later age, and the pirates of the golden age typically captured prosaic merchant goods instead of coin-filled chests of booty (although some of the treasure hauls of the Indian Ocean were massive).

I suppose a third approach is to go unhistorical and dump all the ingredients into the soup at the same time; for instance, in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, the time is later (1720 or so) when the East India company and navy are cracking down on piracy; however, the movies use Port Royal as a base (30 years or so after it sank into the ocean, in the real world), and Tortuga is still a pirate haven in the films, 60 years or so after it diminished in significance.  There's a cogent argument to be made that once you add undead monkeys, ghost ships, pagan gods, and dark magic to any milieu, there's no use crying over a bit of mixed up history.

Seems like a good time for a poll, buckos.  Cast a weather eye over to yon right hand column, if you will, and please be leaving your mark on me latest inquiry.


The image is Howard Pyle's painting, The Buccaneer was a Picturesque Fellow

13 comments:

  1. If you're doing a more historical game (as opposed to a fantasy game with historical trappings), I suspect that "Buccaneers" is the best way to go, since it hits most of what people tend to think of when they think "pirates". Personally, I would go with a more blended setting, but then I would tend towards a more fantasy-with-historical-trappings, too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm pretty much sure that a mix-and-match approach is best. You need to make a place for fantasy elements, and that is easiest to do if you don't limit yourself to history.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I voted for the 'mix 'em all together' approach for much the same reasons.

      Delete
  3. I voted mix-n-match but if pressed I'd go with 17th century before the crackdown as the most fluid, least predictable, moist adventury moment. My own anti-colonial pirates game (coming to a g+ hangout some time next year) centers roughly on 1620-1690 and could span the world, though I'm thinking of it mostly being Java Sea to Japan right now, but it's really not historical enough for that to matter, because I don't want my players to be nervous that they don't understand the setting enough to really be able to play.

    ReplyDelete
  4. After including THIS gem, "once you add undead monkeys, ghost ships, pagan gods, and dark magic to any milieu, there's no use crying over a bit of mixed up history" how could you even ask?!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Make sure you hack XI The Isle of Dread,and add it in. The southern archipelagos from the large world map would make a fantastic, corrupt island chain in the caribbean.


    http://vanishingtower.blogspot.com/2012/09/x1-isle-of-dread-thing-of-beauty.html,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, definitely. But I'd place it in the South Pacific, and make the guys cross the isthmus and hijack vessels, or risk the horn. Plenty of buccaneers had their moments in the Pacific, and I've always pictured monster islands in Oceania.

      Delete
  6. I love this book for historical pirate tactics and practices. http://www.amazon.com/Sea-Rovers-Practice-Techniques-1630-1730/dp/1574889117

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I just ordered that exact one off Amazon a week or so ago, it's on the way. Thanks for the endorsement!

      Delete
  7. Hey there Beedo. I always thought that the "Golden Age" of piracy were the Henry Morgan decades, 1660's to 1680 or so. But I suppose that depends on what your definition of a pirate is. At any rate, it sounds very much like the psuedo-historical potpourri is what you really want. You don't really need us to tell you that.

    By the way, I realize you're pretty much a D&D guy through and through, but I think that at some point you owe it to yourself to at least take a look at Savage Worlds. Especially the Pirates of the Spanish Main or the Savage World of Solomon Kane, both of which would fit beautifully with some of your campaign ideas. Just a suggestion.

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's definitely looking like the middle of the 17th century is the popular choice, and folks are savvy to the differences.

    I need to get that SW Pirates of the Spanish Main book, even if it's just for setting ideas; I have ton of those little plastic ships Wizkids used to make, before they licensed they RPG. It's a bit of a pricey PDF, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can buy a used copy of the book for less than the cost of the PDF these days. It is definitely worth tracking down. (Big Savage Worlds fan here too!)

      Delete
  9. I've been in Portland on a business trip, and since I had a 6 hour flight, I went ahead and got the PDF anyway - glad I did its a tailor- made resource for this kind of campaign I'm glad you guys pushed it, it'll be a huge time saver.

    ReplyDelete